ಟೆಂಪ್ಲೇಟು:Citation needed
 | This template is used on ೫,೮೮,೦೦೦+ pages, or roughly 396% of all pages. To avoid major disruption and server load, any changes should be tested in the template's /sandbox or /testcases subpages, or in your own user subpage. The tested changes can be added to this page in a single edit. Consider discussing changes on the talk page before implementing them. |
 | An introductory version of this documentation is provided at Wikipedia:Citation needed. |
{{Citation needed}} (also known by the redirects {{Cn}} and {{Fact}}) is a template used to identify claims in articles, particularly if questionable, that need a citation to a reliable source. The template produces a superscripted [ಸೂಕ್ತ ಉಲ್ಲೇಖನ ಬೇಕು]
Usage
[ಬದಲಾಯಿಸಿ]{{Citation needed|reason=your explanation here|date=ಡಿಸೆಂಬರ್ ೨೦೨೪}}
Notes:
- The date-substitution template may be used to automatically generate the date, e.g.,
{{Citation needed|{{subst:DATE}}}}. See Help:Substitution for more information. - The
|date=parameter need not be added by the editor: if not entered, a bot will soon add it. The date parameter consists of the full English name of the current month with initial capital, a space, and the year, not full dates; e.g., "January 2013", but not "jan13". Any deviation from these two rules will result in an "invalid date parameter" error. - The
|reason=(without leading capital) parameter is optional but often helpful. It is displayed as a tooltip. For example, the following usage might be appropriate to the claim that "Humphrey Bogart has won several snooker world championships.":{{Citation needed|reason=This claim needs a reliable source; Bogart was a famous actor, and his major biographies don't mention snooker.|date=ಡಿಸೆಂಬರ್ ೨೦೨೪}}
- If double quotation marks are used within the
|reason=parameter, the reason will not be displayed as a tooltip; use single quotes instead. - Use only plain text for the
|reason=parameter. It does not support wiki markup like wikilinks which can "mess up" the tooltip.
- Use of this template places the article into ವರ್ಗ:Articles with unsourced statements and ವರ್ಗ:Articles with unsourced statements from ಡಿಸೆಂಬರ್ ೨೦೨೪ (example).
- Remove the template when you add a citation for a statement.
Examples
[ಬದಲಾಯಿಸಿ]Example 1
[ಬದಲಾಯಿಸಿ]This sentence shows the template used at the end.{{Citation needed|reason=reliable source needed for the whole sentence|date=ಡಿಸೆಂಬರ್ ೨೦೨೪}}
The above wikitext will render as follows:
- This sentence shows the template used at the end.[ಸೂಕ್ತ ಉಲ್ಲೇಖನ ಬೇಕು]
Example 2
[ಬದಲಾಯಿಸಿ]The template indicates that it may be that Humphrey Bogart played snooker at some point and it may be that he won some tournaments at some point but no reliable, published sources were given to verify it and the information is not considered common knowledge.
- Humphrey Bogart has won several snooker world championships.[ಸೂಕ್ತ ಉಲ್ಲೇಖನ ಬೇಕು]
Example 3
[ಬದಲಾಯಿಸಿ]If it is considered that he might have won just one tournament, the template may be placed accordingly; and a reason for the need of a citation may be given, displayed when the mouse hovers on "citation needed":
- Humphrey Bogart has won several[ಸೂಕ್ತ ಉಲ್ಲೇಖನ ಬೇಕು] snooker world championships.
When not to use this template
[ಬದಲಾಯಿಸಿ]Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately. Do not tag it: immediately remove it. This includes material that is doubtful, harmful, or possibly libelous. For some policy about this, see the sections "Remove unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material" at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons and "Burden of evidence" at Wikipedia:Verifiability.
The {{Citation needed}} template is intended for use when there is a general question of the verifiability of a statement, or when an editor believes that a reference verifying the statement should be provided. Other templates are available for other or more specific issues; see the list of inline templates. For example, claims that you think are incorrect should be tagged with {{Dubious}}, and those which represent a non-neutral view should be tagged with {{POV-statement}}. Being specific about the nature of the problem will help other editors correct it.
If you have the time and ability to find an authoritative reference, please do so. Then add the citation yourself, or correct the article text. After all, the ultimate goal is not to merely identify problems, but to fix them.
While an editor may add this template to any uncited passage for any reason, many editors object to what they perceive as overuse of this tag, particularly in what is known as "drive-by" tagging, which is applying the tag without attempting to address the issues at all (hit-and-run). Consider whether adding this tag in an article is the best approach before using it, and use it judiciously. Wikipedia's verifiability policy does not require reliable sources for common well-known facts (e.g., "The Moon orbits the Earth"), or that citations be repeated through every sentence in a paragraph. All direct quotations and facts whose accuracy might be challenged (e.g., statistics) require citations. See WP:MINREF for the list of material that is absolutely required to be followed by an inline citation, rather than a general reference or no citation at all. Also note that the burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material.
This template is intended for specific passages that need citation. For entire articles or sections that contain significant material lacking sources (rather than just specific short passages), there are other, more appropriate templates, such as {{Unreferenced}} or {{Refimprove}}.
Do not use this template on policies, guidelines, or other non-article pages.
How to respond to this tag
[ಬದಲಾಯಿಸಿ]The addition of this tag is a request for an inline citation to support the tagged statement. If you are able to provide a citation to support the claim, then please do so.
Except for certain kinds of claims about living people, which require immediate production of inline citations, there is no specific deadline for providing citations. Please do not delete information that you believe is correct simply because no-one has provided a citation within an arbitrary time limit. Where there is some uncertainty about its accuracy, most editors are willing to wait about a month to see whether a citation can be provided.
Template data
[ಬದಲಾಯಿಸಿ]TemplateData for Citation needed
The template is used to identify claims in articles, particularly if questionable, that need a citation to a reliable source.
| ಪರಿಮಿತಿ | ವಿವರ | ನಮೂನೆ | ಸ್ಥಾನಮಾನ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Month and year | date | Provides the month and year of the citation request; e.g., 'January 2013', but not 'jan13' | String | required |
| Reason for citation | reason | A reason as to why, or for what content, the citation is needed; use single quotes, if any | String | ಐಚ್ಛಿಕ |
Redirects
[ಬದಲಾಯಿಸಿ]- Click here for a list of templates that redirect here and that may also be used.
See also
[ಬದಲಾಯಿಸಿ]- Template:Citation needed (lead), a similar template specifically for the lead of articles
- Wikipedia:Citing sources, especially Unsourced material
- Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources
- Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup#Verifiability and sources
- Wikipedia:Template messages/Sources of articles
- Wikipedia:Verifiability
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Fact and Reference Check
Inline templates
[ಬದಲಾಯಿಸಿ]{{Cite quote}}[this quote needs a citation]: for "actual quotations" which need citations to make them proper.{{Clarify}}[clarification needed]: request clarification of wording or interpretation.{{Examples}}[examples needed]: request examples for clarification.{{Nonspecific}}[not specific enough to verify]: flag a general, yet factual statement as needing to be made more specific before it can be verified.{{Page needed}}[page needed]: request a page number for an existing citation.
Highlighting some text that needs a citation
[ಬದಲಾಯಿಸಿ]{{Citation needed span}}: similar, except that the text needing the citation is changed to a dark slate-gray color while being encapsulated in an off-white box with a pale pink outline. For example:
- Beetles constitute by far[citation needed] the largest order of insects, with 350,000–400,000 species in four suborders.[citation needed]
- This template can be used within a sentence or at the end. Notice that punctuation should be inside the questioned text.
Incomplete citations
[ಬದಲಾಯಿಸಿ]{{Full}}[full citation needed]: in-line request for full citation, for example when only (Author, YEAR) is given.{{Incomplete short citation}}[incomplete short citation]: in-line warning and request for enough information to allow the short citation to uniquely identify a long citation.{{Page needed}}[page needed]: in-line request for the page number or page numbers in a work such as journal for an existing citation.{{Season needed}}[season & episode needed], similar to{{Page needed}}: for missing TV season & episode number.{{Volume needed}}[volume & issue needed], similar to{{Page needed}}: for missing journal, newspaper, comic, volume and issue numbers, etc.
Verification
[ಬದಲಾಯಿಸಿ]{{Better source}}[better source needed]: flags a statement as requiring a better source.{{Dead link}}: request a fix for a dead external link within a paragraph or a reference citation.{{Failed verification}}[not in citation given]: source was checked, and did not contain the cited material.{{Request quotation}}[need quotation to verify]: request a direct quote from an inaccessible source, for verification purposes.{{Self-published inline}}[self-published source?] or{{Self-published source}}[self-published source]: flag a source that cites the author.{{Source need translation}}[source needs translation]: Self-explanatory. See WP:NONENG for policy requirements.{{Verify credibility}}[unreliable source?]: flag a source as possibly being unreliable and/or unverifiable.{{Verify source}}[verification needed]: request that someone verify the cited source backs up the material in the passage.
Content
[ಬದಲಾಯಿಸಿ]{{According to whom}}[according to whom?]{{Definition}}[when defined as?]: flag a definition as being ambiguous/confusing{{Dubious}}[dubious ]: flag something as suspected of being incorrect{{Or}}[original research?]: flag something as possibly containing original research{{Peacock term}}[peacock term]: Avoid peacock terms too{{POV-statement}}[neutrality is disputed]: dispute the neutrality of a passage{{Quantify}}[quantify]: flag a statement as being vague regarding the amount of something{{Technical-statement}}[jargon]: ...flag a word or phrase Wikipedia:Make technical articles understandable{{Time fact}}/{{Chronology citation needed}}[chronology citation needed]: request a source confirming or providing the chronology or timeline of a statement{{Undue-inline}}[undue weight? ]: show that a statement does not ascribe appropriate weight to its sources, according to their prominence; use in preference to...{{Vague}}[vague]: flag a statement that is too vague to be unambiguously verifiable.{{Weasel-inline}}[weasel words]: flag for weasel word cleanup{{When}}[when?]: flags a particular time period as being vague or ambiguous{{Who}}[who?]: for placement after descriptions of a group of persons{{Whom}}/{{By whom}}[by whom?]: placement after mention of a vague third party claim that is not sourced
Timeliness
[ಬದಲಾಯಿಸಿ]{{Update after}}Expression error: Unexpected < operator.: a template that only shows itself after a specified time, indicating an exceptional statement that will date quickly.
Article message box templates
[ಬದಲಾಯಿಸಿ]{{Cite check}}, article/section may have inappropriate or misinterpreted citations.{{Refimprove}}, article/section has weak or incomplete sources/references/citations.{{Unreferenced}}, article/section has no sources/references/citations given at all.- Citation method and style
{{Citation style}}{{No footnotes}}